|
A Brief Overview of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade
David Eltis
(Emory University),
2007
The trans-Atlantic slave trade was the largest long-distance
coerced movement of people in history and, prior to the
mid-nineteenth century, formed the major demographic well-spring
for the re-peopling of the Americas following the collapse of the
Amerindian population. Cumulatively, as late as 1820, nearly four
Africans had crossed the Atlantic for every European, and, given
the differences in the sex ratios between European and African
migrant streams, about four out of every five females that
traversed the Atlantic were from Africa. From the late fifteenth
century, the Atlantic Ocean, once a formidable barrier that
prevented regular interaction between those peoples inhabiting the
four continents it touched, became a commercial highway that
integrated the histories of Africa, Europe, and the Americas for
the first time. As the above figures suggest, slavery and the slave
trade were the linchpins of this process. With the decline of the
Amerindian population, labor from Africa formed the basis of the
exploitation of the gold and agricultural resources of the export
sectors of the Americas, with sugar plantations absorbing well over
two thirds of slaves carried across the Atlantic by the major
European and Euro-American powers. For several centuries slaves
were the most important reason for contact between Europeans and
Africans.
What can explain this extraordinary migration, organized
initially on a continent where the institution of slavery had
declined or totally disappeared in the centuries prior to Columbian
contact, and where, even when it had existed, slavery had never
been confined to one group of people? To pose the question
differently, why slavery, and why were the slaves carried across
the Atlantic exclusively African? The short answer to the first of
these two questions is that European expansion to the Americas was
to mainly tropical and semi-tropical areas. Several products that
were either unknown to Europeans (like tobacco), or occupied a
luxury niche in pre-expansion European tastes (like gold or sugar),
now fell within the capacity of Europeans to produce more
abundantly. But while Europeans could control the production of
such exotic goods, it became apparent in the first two centuries
after Columbian contact that they chose not to supply the labor
that would make such output possible. Free European migrants and
indentured servants never traveled across the Atlantic in
sufficient numbers to meet the labor needs of expanding
plantations. Convicts and prisoners – the only Europeans who were
ever forced to migrate – were much fewer in numbers again. Slavery
or some form of coerced labor was the only possible option if
European consumers were to gain access to more tropical produce and
precious metals.
| |